Closed jacobtylerwalls closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 95.80%. Comparing base (
67acc96
) to head (b96d40b
).
🤖 Effect of this PR on checked open source code: 🤖
Effect on sentry: The following messages are now emitted:
Isn't there a clean way to fix it instead of using a heuristic?
Redesigning the parallelization of the primer sounds like the way to fix it cleanly, but if a fix doesn't develop over the next few days I guess I'd rather have this than nothing.
That said, this check might not be in the right place, looking into it.
I reread https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/pull/9925#issuecomment-2358249852 and paid closer attention to what you said about cancel-in-progress: true
. I'll close this out and try another approach now that I understand your theory better!
Refs https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/pull/9925#issuecomment-2358249852
cc/ @akamat10