Closed subssn21 closed 7 years ago
Here are the params I was using on my project to build the ContentItemResponse in case it helps anyone
content = {
'@context': "http://purl.imsglobal.org/ctx/lti/v1/ContentItem",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "LtiLinkItem",
"mediaType": "application/vnd.ims.lti.v1.ltilink",
"url": self.absolute_url("/lti/course/%s/activity/%s" % (course_id, activity_id))
}
]
}
params = {'lti_message_type': 'ContentItemSelection',
'lti_version': 'LTI-1p0',
'content_items': json.dumps(content)
}
Merging #41 into master will decrease coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is87.8%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #41 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.37% 82.34% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 13 15 +2
Lines 607 623 +16
Branches 110 111 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 500 513 +13
- Misses 79 82 +3
Partials 28 28
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/lti/contentitem_response.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
src/lti/__init__.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/lti/tool_consumer.py | 66.66% <100%> (-17.71%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/lti/launch_params.py | 89.85% <100%> (+0.46%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/lti/tool_base.py | 88.67% <33.33%> (-3.33%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/lti/tool_outbound.py | 88.88% <88.88%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 93b260e...39fbaff. Read the comment docs.
Tested Content Item Code on Moodle this morning and worked great without any changes
Here is an initial pull request for a working implementation of the Content Item Specification.
It has been successfully tested against Canvas
Fixes #39
A basic set of tests are included for the new ContentItemResponse class, they are basically a copy of the TestToolConsumer class.
There is a lot that can be done to make this code better, but the code works, and we can easily make it better as time goes on.