3 screenshots are missing, and I wasn't sure where to find them.
This text refers to Chris F's multilevel notebook. However, it does not seem a good practice to refer to a cell number in another notebook, as it could easily change:
Critically, many effects that look quite large and significant in the non-hiearchical model actually turn out to be much smaller when we take the group distribution into account (this point can also well be seen in plot In[12] in Chris Fonnesbeck's notebook {ref}multilevel_modeling. Shrinkage can thus be viewed as a form of smart regularization that helps reduce false-positives!
Description
References
References pymc-devs/pymc #5460 (Update example gallery style and formatting)
References Project Board: https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc-examples/projects/1
[x] Notebook follows style guide https://docs.pymc.io/en/latest/contributing/jupyter_style.html
[x] PR description contains a link to the relevant issue: a tracker one for existing notebooks or a proposal one for new notebooks
[x] Check the notebook is not excluded from any pre-commit check: https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc-examples/blob/main/.pre-commit-config.yaml
Notes for the Reviewer
DataUmbrellaPyMCSprint