Closed ericmjl closed 7 years ago
That's probably the best way -- I think we recently started returning figs/axes/gridspecs for all the plotting functions. I would be interested to hear how easy/hard customizing this is: if there's an object you need that isn't returned, happy to make a quick PR.
@ColCarroll thanks for the quick response! I'm thinking of thickening the forestplot lines, but I'm not quite sure how to manipulate a gridspec
object - I know how to get the list of children from an axes
object, though. Just wondering what the design considerations were in making the forestplot return gridspec
rather than axes
? While I've tried, I can't seem to figure that out from reading the source code.
I'm definitely not an expert with matplotlib, but if I recall, gridspec
is something of a deep cut, and I'm not sure the rationale for using it (except perhaps that it was convenient at the time?), though I have no easy suggestion to swap out for it. There is an open issue with gridspec
playing poorly with resizing figures: https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc3/issues/1946
@fonnesbeck fixed the bug(s) I introduced last time I touched that code, though.
I think I did a "good enough" hack -> plt.gca()
to get the axes object, and then directly manipulating the children objects on there. Thanks for taking the time to respond though!
For presentation purposes, I'm just wondering whether it's possible to, say, make the forestplot lines thicker? Would it be best accomplished by taking the gridspec object that's returned and manipulating that directly? (Was just looking for a yes/no/short answer, don't want to take up too much of your time!)