Upgrade to ruff 0.2.0 and fix RUF017

[Armavica]

• --show-source -> --output-format=full
• --line-length removed from .pre-commit because it is in pyproject
• ruff.extend-per-file-ignores -> ruff.lint.extend-per-file-ignores
• fixed three instances of quadratic list summations

Description

Related Issue

• [ ] Closes #
• [ ] Related to #

Checklist

• [x] Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• [ ] Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• [ ] Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• [x] If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Type of change

• [ ] New feature / enhancement
• [ ] Bug fix
• [ ] Documentation
• [x] Maintenance
• [ ] Other (please specify):

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc--7129.org.readthedocs.build/en/7129/

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (94020c9) 90.17% compared to head (70de7e2) 90.17%.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7129?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #7129 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.17% 90.17% ======================================= Files 101 101 Lines 16932 16933 +1 ======================================= + Hits 15269 15270 +1 Misses 1663 1663 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7129?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pymc/logprob/scan.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7129?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs#diff-cHltYy9sb2dwcm9iL3NjYW4ucHk=) | `97.52% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [pymc/variational/opvi.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7129?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs#diff-cHltYy92YXJpYXRpb25hbC9vcHZpLnB5) | `74.06% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [pymc/backends/report.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7129?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs#diff-cHltYy9iYWNrZW5kcy9yZXBvcnQucHk=) | `79.24% <50.00%> (+0.39%)` | :arrow_up: |

[Armavica]

It looks like this test failure is unrelated to these changes, as it already occurs in main.

[maresb]

Hmm...

FAILED tests/variational/test_inference.py::test_fit_start[SVGD-mini] - Failed: DID NOT WARN. No warnings of type (<class 'UserWarning'>,) were emitted.
 Emitted warnings: [].

[ricardoV94]

Hmm...

FAILED tests/variational/test_inference.py::test_fit_start[SVGD-mini] - Failed: DID NOT WARN. No warnings of type (<class 'UserWarning'>,) were emitted.
 Emitted warnings: [].

it's failing everywhere I'll check Monday