added icdf for asymmetric laplace distribution

[ParamThakkar123]

Description

Added icdf function for Asymmetric Laplace distribution

Related Issue

• [ ] Closes
• [ ] Related to #6612

Checklist

• [ ] Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• [ ] Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• [ ] Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• [ ] If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Type of change

• [x] New feature / enhancement
• [ ] Bug fix
• [ ] Documentation
• [ ] Maintenance
• [ ] Other (please specify):

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc--7141.org.readthedocs.build/en/7141/

[ParamThakkar123]

@larryshamalama please take a look at my pull request

[ParamThakkar123]

Are there any changes needed to be done ?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (7bb2ccd) 92.21% compared to head (17338f6) 71.34%. Report is 31 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head 17338f6 differs from pull request most recent head bb312a8. Consider uploading reports for the commit bb312a8 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7141?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #7141 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 92.21% 71.34% -20.87% =========================================== Files 101 101 Lines 16912 16967 +55 =========================================== - Hits 15595 12105 -3490 - Misses 1317 4862 +3545 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7141?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pymc/distributions/continuous.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7141?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs#diff-cHltYy9kaXN0cmlidXRpb25zL2NvbnRpbnVvdXMucHk=) | `64.36% <50.00%> (-33.43%)` | :arrow_down: | ... and [82 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pymc-devs/pymc/pull/7141/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pymc-devs)

[ParamThakkar123]

@larryshamalama I made the changes.

[larryshamalama]

Have you checked if the test passes locally? That would be an indication, good or bad, if you are on the right track

[ParamThakkar123]

@ricardoV94 I changed the if else conditions in python to pytensor condition