Closed rlaker closed 11 months ago
Thanks very much for this @rlaker! Just letting you know that this is on my list. Things are hectic but I will be able to request changes or approve/merge in the first few days of Dec. So around the end of this week.
Sorry for the delay on this @rlaker. I think this is good to merge. We just have a failing test. Tests pass for me locally, so it could perhaps be a version issue, or sometimes remote tests randomly just fail. I'll try to trigger those tests again and see what happens.
Remote failing tests should hopefully be fixed whenever https://github.com/pymc-devs/pytensor/pull/550 is fixed and make its way into a new pytensor release. Or when https://github.com/pymc-labs/CausalPy/issues/279 is resolved. So don't sink any effort into trying to fix failing remote tests right now. You can of course ensure that all local tests pass - they are not affected by the issue. Not on my machine anyway.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
c17fcf2
) 75.86% compared to head (0c3f23d
) 75.86%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Fix for #273