`LogisticSaturation` class does not document all of it's parameters

[cluhmann]

The logistic saturation function seems to come in 2 varieties. There is the LogisticSaturation class defined here and then there is the logistic_saturation function defined here. The former has no documentation of parameters (though there is a brief vignette?) and instead says it is a "Wrapper around logistic saturation function" and see the documentation on the latter. The problem is that there the former takes a parameter (beta) that is not found anywhere in the latter. And the vignette doesn't help because it passes in no parameter values. At best, this seems very confusing.

Are there other functions and wrappers that behave like this?

[cluhmann]

Looking at it again, I realize that the code in the docstring isn't a vignette, but rather generates a plot. I don't think we need this in the LogisticSaturation class docstring as it a) doesn't show off the invoking code (and thus is totally mysterious) and b) is redundant with the (much prettier and more informative) plots in the logistic_saturation function doc string. If the plot showed off plots for various values of beta and lam that would be unique and potentially useful, but right now it's not.

[wd60622]

All of the Saturation transformations get a scaling parameter beta in order to match with the Menten alpha parameter. It might be documented in the module since it applies to most of them.

If you have a suggestion of how to improve it, please let me know.

EDIT: I took a look at the module docs and don't see something for that. I think we should re-document the parameters required for each one of the transformations so they are seen in this context as well.

My suggestion is:

• [ ] Add general note in the module docstring for beta parameters in the case of curve asymptotically reaches 1.0
• [ ] Add parameter documentation for each one of the SaturationTransformations (and Adstock classes)

Thoughts @cluhmann?

[cluhmann]

So if there's a note added to the module, where would that show up?

[wd60622]

So if there's a note added to the module, where would that show up?

That was part of my edit and realization; it is not there. I added to my action items

[cluhmann]

So if there's a note added to the module, where would that show up?

That was part of my edit and realization; it is not there. I added to my action items

Yeah, I was asking where it would show up if it was added. I just don't have a sense of where I would find it in the docs if this issue was addressed in the way you are suggesting.

[wd60622]

I was thinking about the module docstring. So in pymc_marketing.mmm.components.saturation.py at the top. Do you have any other suggestions?

[cluhmann]

Sure, and where would it appear in the docs if it was there? Here?

[wd60622]

Sure, and where would it appear in the docs if it was there? Here?

Yes. Somewhere in that top section. Sound reasonable home for it?

[cluhmann]

I guess, but if people find their way to one of the constituent saturation components (looking for details about the LogisticSaturation), then the use of beta will still not be evident. So how do we alert people to the actual set of parameters of the individual saturation components?

[wd60622]

Yeah, thats why I have the second item to add documentation for each transformation class

[cluhmann]

Yup, I think that works then.