Closed Mattstorey closed 5 years ago
Hi Mattstorey,
Thank you for reporting this! Can you please send me a mzML and a spectrum ID (or only the affected spectrum as XML tag) where the problem occurs? Also, did you check for these "fake" peaks only in the plot or also in the data array returned by .peaks('centroided')? It would also be good to know if the data in your file is in profile mode or if you performed peak picking when converting from RAW etc. to mzML.
Best, Manuel
Hi,
I did have a look at the (mz , i) values produced from .peaks('centroided') and the 'fake' values are in the output, this was from data converted without peak picking. So it would seem there is something up with the centroiding function in this case.
The problem can be worked around by peak picking during the conversion (with msconvert) and plotting the .peaks('raw') data.
I'm more than happy to send you an example mzml file but I can't upload it here, the file type isn't supported. Is there another way to get you the file?
Cheers, Matt
Could you upload it in dropbox/gdrive or any other filehost and share it with me?
Here is a link for you to have a look at!
https://drive.google.com/open?id=15T1MYZuPfg5mpHU6gQz3WevqMIk7jCXX
Spectrums with the IDs: 12535, 13540, 11532, 9523 are good examples of the strange centroided behavior.
Below is an example of the plot for spectrum 13540, I'm not sure if there are enough molecules in the observable universe to get a count that high!
Okay thats really strange! I'm going to have a look and keep you updated. In your first post, you said that similar behavior has been seen before, can you point me to an issue etc? Because I can't remember having seen this issue before.
Hi Matt,
funny error, I found the bug and fixed it. Please checkout the hotfix/centroiding branch.
Hope that helps
Cheers
.c
Awesome!
Fixed with #129 I'll upload a new release to pypi.
Hi,
I have been seeing the issue of very large 'fake' peaks showing up when using .peaks('centroided'). Only happens for some spectra. I see that similar behavior has been seen before but I can't work out how to fix it. Also, when comparing to plots from other software it looks like some of the intensities are not quite right.
Cheers.