Open hookercookerman opened 1 year ago
With this issue and #1000, I'm starting to think that adding the possible discriminator values as a filter expression wasn't the best idea.
in the whole single table design hotness, there are many scenarios where a query will go across types, does this lead to a more abstracted Query object, I think it might.
it would also be nice to able to flag if I want deserialisation to happen or not or provide my own func to do so,
in terms of filter I think the filter condition is optional and defaulted not to happen,
if I know that for 100% that I have an entity in the items I am querying aka no indexes without projected values and I only want those items then I can flag it on to happern.
cheers
Notice here we will get an error with the FilterExpression due to the fact that cls is not in the projection.
Whats the best way around this issue ?