Closed crbates closed 9 years ago
@gidden or @scopatz could you check over this when you get a chance.
Hopefully @gidden or @elliottbiondo can, I don't plan on sleeping because of cyclus until the 24th :)
Cameron
Could you go straight to version 4.7.0 of moab, to keep compatability with DAGMC
Thanks
Andy
Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
@makeclean I don't know enough about the MOAB development process to be comfortable committing to code thats still in RC status. Is 4.7.0RC1 considered production quality?
ping @gidden @elliottbiondo @scopatz
I will take a look at this tomorrow.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Cameron Bates notifications@github.com wrote:
ping @gidden https://github.com/gidden @elliottbiondo https://github.com/elliottbiondo @scopatz https://github.com/scopatz
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pyne/pyne-ci/pull/18#issuecomment-60709400.
Hi @makeclean and @elliottbiondo and @julry, I think that you three are the only ones knowledgable enough about MOAB to make this change. Perhaps this should be a separate PR from one of you. In any event, MOAB versioning should not block python versioning. They are separate issues. Thanks!
The thinking was to start I would just add the Python3 build as a distinct platform build.
This seems fine to me.
In any event, MOAB versioning should not block python versioning.
Agreed. Merged.
also update moab to 4.6.3