Closed pradyunsg closed 1 year ago
Thanks! No worries about the conflict with #152; I'll fix them once this is in.
@takluyver A gentle nudge for a re-review. :)
On the basis that:
pypa/pep517
are a bit confusing without this changeI'm gonna go ahead and merge this without waiting on a re-review. If someone reckons that might be overstepping or would otherwise prefer that I wait in the future, please let me know!
Thanks Pradyun, and sorry I didn't get around to reviewing it again - I'm happy, in any case.
Toward #136
@takluyver I just noticed #152 (🤦🏽) and this has a few overlapping changes with that.