add "License :: OSI Approved :: NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA)"

[ebo]

Request to add a new NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA) classifier:

 "License :: OSI Approved :: NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA)"

According to various documentation[*], NOSA is an approved OSI open-source license, but is not contained in any of the online classifier lists.

Inclusion will help facilitate using NOSA in various python projects.

• https://opensource.gsfc.nasa.gov/nosa.php

[ebo]

If this was already there and I missed it, I will feel rather stupid.
Sorry for wasting everyone's time.

On Feb 22 2024 12:26 PM, Dustin Ingram wrote:

@di requested changes on this pull request.

@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ "License :: OSI Approved :: Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1)", "License :: OSI Approved :: Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL 2.0)", "License :: OSI Approved :: Mulan Permissive Software License v2 (MulanPSL-2.0)",

• "License :: OSI Approved :: NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA)",

    "License :: OSI Approved :: NASA Open Source Agreement v1.3 
(NASA-1.3)",

Per https://opensource.org/license/nasa1-3-php, OSI calls this "NASA Open Source Agreement v1.3" and the SPDX Identifier is NASA-1.3

[tcaduser]

Hi @ebo, it looks to me like @di is just requesting you to accept the proposed change. @di asked me to do the same thing for my proposed license addition.

[ebo]

Ah. I misunderstood the point of the comment. I would say that I approve the change (not sure where I need to do this, but it is OK with me). I wish I had read this earlier in the day -- NASA's Open Source Initiative meeting was this afternoon, and I would have been able to get them to approve of the name or bump it up. They were surprised that it was named NASA-{ver} instead of NOSA, but I can run this up the chain and talk to the lawyers who approve the licensing.

I would say for now go with NASA-{ver} as that is what OSI has, and I will talk to NASA's licensing lawyers to see if they are OK with that or if I should submit a name change through OSI, et. al.

On Feb 22 2024 3:22 PM, Juan Sanchez wrote:

Hi @ebo, it looks to me like @di is just requesting you to accept the proposed change. @di asked me to do the same thing for my proposed license addition.

[ebo]

do you want me to make these changes and resubmit the pull request? I was confused on what you wanted me to do next.

[tcaduser]

I would try: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/incorporating-feedback-in-your-pull-request

[di]

@ebo If the change I made is OK with you, we can merge this.

[ebo]

Yes, it is OK. Sorry, I have been down with cluster headaches. Only u for a few to try to eat something.

On Mar 3 2024 11:57 AM, Dustin Ingram wrote:

@ebo If the change I made is OK with you, we can merge this.