Closed axtimhaus closed 3 weeks ago
I believe there are still some places where RollPass
needs to be changed to BaseRollPass
.
One example i found:
https://github.com/pyroll-project/pyroll-core/blob/77e9edab877bc7b85434e66ae5b65f71795041af/pyroll/core/roll_pass/hookimpls/deformation_unit.py#L94-L96
Or am i understanding this wrong?
I believe there are still some places where
RollPass
needs to be changed toBaseRollPass
. One example i found:Or am i understanding this wrong?
So you don't have to change all the references from RollPass
to BaseRollPass
as every RollPass
is also a BaseRollPass
.
In the case that you mentioned it is no problem. I just noticed, that when running the tests 2 fail to converge.
Yes but previously this function was also able to be used by ThreeRollPasses
, what is now no longer possible. So from my understanding these general functions should all specify BaseRollPass
so that other more specific classes can use them aswell.
PS: I also use this function in the zouhar-package for ThreeRollPasses which is where i noticed that for example.
Yes but previously this function was also able to be used by
ThreeRollPasses
, what is now no longer possible. So from my understanding these general functions should all specifyBaseRollPass
so that other more specific classes can use them aswell.PS: I also use this function in the zouhar-package for ThreeRollPasses which is where i noticed that for example.
Your right, I thought the hirachy was still BaseRollPass -> RollPass -> ThreeRollPass but now is BaseRollPass -> RollPass, BaseRollPass -> ThreeRollPass. So you can adjust those and commit.
test_solve3 -> Seems to be an error in report due to the new Class
This is why I said
For example the report breaks with this PR, because there is a check for RollPass only, which yields now results in 3RP only sequences.
@RichardPfr you are right with this hook. But this impl has nevertheless to be implemented on BaseRollPass
, and not on DeformationUnit
. So then the isinstance
check is not necessary
The wrong place of this hook impl made me missing it.
I fixed, moved and simplified it.
@BaseRollPass.Profile.contact_lines
def contact_contour_lines(self: BaseRollPass.Profile):
rp = self.roll_pass
return [linemerge(cl.intersection(self.cross_section.exterior)) for cl in rp.contour_lines]
rebase
As an idea to solve the issues that rose in #241
This is a breaking change, so at least new minor version. For example the report breaks with this PR, because there is a check for
RollPass
only, which yields now results in 3RP only sequences.This would also simplify future intro of multiple rolls as in #104