codecov[bot]
commented
9 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
5ced626) 94.59% compared to head (dcd5e0d) 94.59%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #314 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.59% 94.59% ======================================= Files 63 63 Lines 1591 1591 ======================================= Hits 1505 1505 Misses 86 86 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyronear/pyro-api/pull/314/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyronear) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyronear/pyro-api/pull/314/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyronear) | `94.59% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyronear#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The full package doc is not available: deadlink.
Hence, I suggest to delete this part of the doc until there is a new doc available. Maybe we have a proper link ?
Happy to discuss it !