Closed jklenzing closed 1 year ago
Note from RC tests with pysatModels: something is clearly not set up correctly in the toml. Error info below. Possibly just needs setuptools
minimum version
Run pip install --no-deps -i https://test.pypi.org/simple/ pysatNASA
Looking in indexes: https://test.pypi.org/simple/
Collecting pysatNASA
Downloading https://test-files.pythonhosted.org/packages/9b/33/674f09bbd844fa9759840c752bfeacaf99c520f57019d1655ee52dde2956/pysatNASA-0.0.4.1.tar.gz (54 kB)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 54.9/54.9 kB 6.7 MB/s eta 0:00:00
Installing build dependencies: started
Installing build dependencies: finished with status 'error'
error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× pip subprocess to install build dependencies did not run successfully.
│ exit code: 1
╰─> [3 lines of output]
Looking in indexes: https://test.pypi.org/simple/
ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement setuptools (from versions: none)
ERROR: No matching distribution found for setuptools
[end of output]
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip.
error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× pip subprocess to install build dependencies did not run successfully.
│ exit code: 1
╰─> See above for output.
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip.
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
As a test case, I left a few metadata entries in setup.cfg and made an upload to test pypi.
https://test.pypi.org/project/pysatNASA/0.0.5.dev0/
in pyproject:
[project]
name = "pysatNASA"
version = "0.0.5dev0"
description = "pysat support for NASA Instruments"
readme = "README.md"
requires-python = ">=3.8"
license = {file = "LICENSE"}
authors = [
{name = "Jeff Klenzing, et al", email = "pysat.developers@gmail.com"},
]
in setup.cfg:
[metadata]
name = pysatNASA
author = pysat Team
The compiled distribution takes the author name from setup and the email contact from pyproject. We should probably choose one or the other to maintain metadata.
Now downstream of #168 since fixes are required to run on github actions
Can you also add the test for the operational system?
Configuring the operational test is breaking, not sure why.
Configuring the operational test is breaking, not sure why.
Let me know if you want me to take a look.
Let me know if you want me to take a look.
Here's the log:
https://github.com/pysat/pysatNASA/actions/runs/4988176634/jobs/8930652380
Here's your problem: https://github.com/googleapis/python-api-core/issues/27
Use of pkg_resources
is deprecated, and should be replaced with importlib.metadata.version('pysatNASA')
. For Python 3.6 we'll need to require importlib_metadata
to do the same thing. Specifically:
FWIW, both
pkg_resources
and directly invokingsetup.py install
are semi-deprecated and are mostly unsupported.The replacement for
pkg_resources.distribution(...).version
isimportlib.metadata.version(...)
(backported to pre-3.7 Python asimportlib_metadata
), though I doubt that will solve anyone's problem if the installation metadata is simply not present.More context about the
setup.py install
deprecation here, but the short answer is that you should always preferpip install
tosetup.py install
, even in a package manager. A few people (particularly those involved in Arch linux packaging) have been working on minimal PEP 517 build frontend to build wheels and a minimal wheel installer, so possibly early adoption of those technologies will work better for you [original user].Originally posted by @pganssle in https://github.com/googleapis/python-api-core/issues/27#issuecomment-676563754
@aburrell, that works to a point. Still getting
E importlib_metadata.PackageNotFoundError: No package metadata was found for pysatNASA
It looks like the metadata is not being configured correctly for this version. I've tried updated the backend to the legacy version. Any other thoughts?
@aburrell, that works to a point. Still getting
E importlib_metadata.PackageNotFoundError: No package metadata was found for pysatNASA
It looks like the metadata is not being configured correctly for this version. I've tried updated the backend to the legacy version. Any other thoughts?
If I add metadata to the setup.cfg, it works. Probably worth a discussion about which metadata we want to store where at the next meeting.
Please don't mention me in projects I'm not related too.
If I add metadata to the setup.cfg, it works.
Well at least there's a path forward. We may need to keep using setup.cfg for a while.
Description
Addresses https://github.com/pysat/pysat/issues/1051
Support for setup.py in pip has been deprecated. This brings the package up to standard.
Changes in development flow
__version__
from thispip install .
orpip install -e .
for development casepython -m build
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Inspection of pypi test page at: https://test.pypi.org/simple/pysatNASA
Checklist:
develop
(notmain
) branchCHANGELOG.md
, summarizing the changes