Closed jklenzing closed 1 year ago
Hi, is there any plan to include tlimb and tdisk data products for GOLD data? Thanks
Hi @landsito, we are definitely interested in adding more GOLD data. This issue has fallen on the back burner while we sort out updates for the next version, but it's still in the queue.
Testing over all datasets from @landsito's branch, we have a very strong load success rate: nmax - 99.7% Success nmax - 0.3% Unique Error nmax - 0.0% Unknown Error tlimb - 100.0% Success tlimb - 0.0% Unique Error tlimb - 0.0% Unknown Error tdisk - 100.0% Success tdisk - 0.0% Unique Error tdisk - 0.0% Unknown Error o2den - 100.0% Success o2den - 0.0% Unique Error o2den - 0.0% Unknown Error
The uniqueness errors only appear in nmax data 0.3% of the time (assuming I use a sortby command to fix the non-monotonic issues). I'm going to move forward with a quick patch to fix the nmax for now. It won't necessarily replace this issue, but it will make the code much more functional.
NOTE: The warning message for this was dropped a few months ago when the general routine was used for init
.
Alternatives to separate inst_ids:
load
routine and display a warning / error message there.Pinging @aburrell for thoughts.
I like the idea of nanoseconds.
OK. Putting this on the roadmap for 0.0.5
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Each GOLD data file contains two instruments -- Channel A and Channel B. This breaks pysat standards since the time-series does not monotonically increase.
Describe the solution you'd like
inst_id
to load only part of the dataDescribe alternatives you've considered Technically, someone wanting both channels would have to load the data twice. Howver, the load routine is quick.
Additional context https://github.com/pysat/pysat/issues/614