Hello Alexey,
as requested, I added a new commit in my fork in order to implement a test for the get_proof() function.
At the moment, I left some "print" call in the test for debugging purpose (I'll remove them in a successive commit) because in my opinion the get_proof() function doesn't work for some solvers.
More specifically, here is the result of the test on my laptop:
Here is a short analysis (just a personal opinion):
The problem is:
Cadical103 and Cadical153 return an empty proof. This seems to be wrong
maplesat has a problem when prints the variables. Indeed, the variable "3" doesn't exist (I think it should add a "-1" in the function that prints the proof)
lingeling is probably fine (but there are 2 variables. It could depend on how the solver handles the UNSAT)
I don't know if the output produced by maplecm is ok (I haven't had the time to go further)
MinisatGH, Minisat22, Minicard don't support the get_proof() function
Please, check my commit and let me know your ideas.
Hello Alexey, as requested, I added a new commit in my fork in order to implement a test for the get_proof() function.
At the moment, I left some "print" call in the test for debugging purpose (I'll remove them in a successive commit) because in my opinion the get_proof() function doesn't work for some solvers.
More specifically, here is the result of the test on my laptop:
Here is a short analysis (just a personal opinion):
The problem is:
Please, check my commit and let me know your ideas.
Thank you. Regards, Marco