codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
ff0425a) 97.74% compared to head (c7dde37) 97.74%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #178 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.74% 97.74% ======================================= Files 33 33 Lines 1508 1508 ======================================= Hits 1474 1474 Misses 34 34 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [topomodelx/base/conv.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9iYXNlL2NvbnYucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/hypergraph/hnhn\_layer\_bis.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9oeXBlcmdyYXBoL2huaG5fbGF5ZXJfYmlzLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/hypergraph/unigin\_layer.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9oeXBlcmdyYXBoL3VuaWdpbl9sYXllci5weQ==) | `93.33% <ø> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/base/aggregation.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9iYXNlL2FnZ3JlZ2F0aW9uLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/base/message\_passing.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9iYXNlL21lc3NhZ2VfcGFzc2luZy5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/cell/can\_layer.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9jZWxsL2Nhbl9sYXllci5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/cell/can\_layer\_bis.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9jZWxsL2Nhbl9sYXllcl9iaXMucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/cell/ccxn\_layer.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9jZWxsL2NjeG5fbGF5ZXIucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/cell/cwn\_layer.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9jZWxsL2N3bl9sYXllci5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [topomodelx/nn/hypergraph/allset\_layer.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team#diff-dG9wb21vZGVseC9ubi9oeXBlcmdyYXBoL2FsbHNldF9sYXllci5weQ==) | `91.52% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | ... and [22 more](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyt-team/TopoModelX/pull/178?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyt-team) | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
These have been automatically generated by
autotypingand are by no means perfect. For example at certain places more specificLiteraltypes instead ofstrcould be used. This is, however, already a huge step in the right direction.Along the way, this also fixed some documentation errors or moved to a more consistent documentation style.
See #174