Open davidszotten opened 2 years ago
Hi @davidszotten,
There's https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/10209 open to at least fall back to native traceback printing temporarily, https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9159 tracks the full support.
hi @nicoddemus , thanks for the quick reply. just to be clear, i'm talking about
https://docs.python.org/3.11/whatsnew/3.11.html#enhanced-error-locations-in-tracebacks
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "distance.py", line 11, in <module>
print(manhattan_distance(p1, p2))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "distance.py", line 6, in manhattan_distance
return abs(point_1.x - point_2.x) + abs(point_1.y - point_2.y)
^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'x'
not exception groups. or are the two tied together?
🤦 Sorry indeed they are not related, sorry for the confusion.
I don't think we have any plans regarding that (a quick search did not turn out much), but this is something we should definitely look into.
Btw you asked for pointers: the traceback printing code starts in ExceptionRepr.toterminal
, it should be possible to figure out/understand the code from there.
You can of course get the native representation with pytest --tb=native
, but it would indeed be good to support the more precise locations in long
, short
, and auto
modes too 🙂
Hi. Are there any plans to support PEP-657 style enhanced tracebacks when on py 3.11? with some pointers i'd be happy to look at implemetation