Closed timhoffm closed 3 months ago
Since the change is trivial, I have not added a changelog entry (which I've read as optional in the PR template). However, CI complains. Should I still add a changelog or do you ignore the CI complaint?
Should I still add a changelog or do you ignore the CI complaint?
Feel free to ignore, we can tell the bot its OK by adding a label (which I just did)
❌ Failed to cleanly apply d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a on top of patchback/backports/8.2.x/d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a/pr-12586
origin
remote.upstream
. If you don't
have it, here's how you can add it:
$ git remote add upstream https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest.git
$ git fetch upstream
$ git checkout -b patchback/backports/8.2.x/d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a/pr-12586 upstream/8.2.x
$ git cherry-pick -x d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a
If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a is a merge but no -m option was given.
, add -m 1
as follows instead:
$ git cherry-pick -m1 -x d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a
$ git push origin patchback/backports/8.2.x/d47972b680271fceff2b54208c0697de8e0d996a/pr-12586
🤖 @patchback I'm built with octomachinery and my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.
"Security" was marked with a different heading level than all other entries on that page, effectively making it a subsection of "pytest for enterprise". This seems like an oversight. Security is not just for enterprises and should be on the same level as all other sections.