Closed tomchristie closed 4 years ago
Merging #104 into master will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #104 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.14% 99.15% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 937 952 +15
Branches 173 175 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 929 944 +15
Misses 7 7
Partials 1 1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
h11/tests/test_connection.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
h11/tests/test_events.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
h11/tests/test_headers.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
h11/_connection.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
h11/_headers.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
h11/_readers.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
h11/_writers.py | 88.73% <100.00%> (+0.16%) |
:arrow_up: |
h11/tests/test_io.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
h11/tests/helpers.py | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 1 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1540843...5f77670. Read the comment docs.
Okay, I think this is about the best we can do here. I've updated the docs to include the one extra point of API that's now exposed.
Unavoidably it does benchmark marginally slower that the current master
branch.
Before...
7211.1 requests/sec
7300.6 requests/sec
7298.3 requests/sec
7271.7 requests/sec
7342.2 requests/sec
7310.1 requests/sec
7334.3 requests/sec
After...
7025.6 requests/sec
7094.9 requests/sec
7095.7 requests/sec
7094.9 requests/sec
7115.5 requests/sec
7053.5 requests/sec
7104.2 requests/sec
Averaging to: 7295 requests/sec -> 7083 requests/sec
What do we think about this folks? @njsmith, @pgjones?
(From my POV I'd really like to get this resolved - we're currently treating it as one of our HTTPX 1.0 blockers.)
🙏💚😇
@StephenBrown2 @pgjones Would one of you be able to review this fine work? I'm not qualified (and not part of python-hyper anyways) and @njsmith isn't currently available for OSS reviews (even on Trio)
Minded to merge - happy to be corrected - will merge and release over the weekend if not.
@pgjones Fantastic - pretty excited to get this one resolved. 🤗 Presumably we'll bump to 0.11 for this release?
Closes #31
Based on #103, focusing on minimising benchmark regressions.
event.headers
is a sequence-like instance, containing two-tuples of bytes.event.headers.raw_items()
is a list of two-tuples of(raw_name, value)
.Three benchmark runs here against each case.
Running against current master...
7330.1 requests/sec 7357.9 requests/sec 7363.4 requests/sec 7310.5 requests/sec 7363.2 requests/sec 7354.3 requests/sec 7363.3 requests/sec
7321.4 requests/sec 7355.2 requests/sec 7353.7 requests/sec 7375.7 requests/sec 7352.6 requests/sec 7381.0 requests/sec 7410.0 requests/sec
7234.4 requests/sec 7274.0 requests/sec 7231.8 requests/sec 7272.5 requests/sec 7263.7 requests/sec 7268.9 requests/sec 7273.7 requests/sec
Running against this PR...
7022.7 requests/sec 7041.2 requests/sec 7052.2 requests/sec 7038.3 requests/sec 7038.5 requests/sec 7042.8 requests/sec 7053.2 requests/sec
7129.9 requests/sec 7145.6 requests/sec 7152.4 requests/sec 7158.3 requests/sec 7154.1 requests/sec 7116.6 requests/sec 7146.2 requests/sec
7080.6 requests/sec 7077.9 requests/sec 7100.3 requests/sec 7051.9 requests/sec 7091.7 requests/sec 7072.6 requests/sec 7056.3 requests/sec