Open mickp opened 4 years ago
@NickHallONBI - can you test this with the hardware when you get a chance?
Testing today on the cryo Aurox setup appears to work.
One problem is the docstring..
Config sample: device(microscope.filterwheels.aurox.Clarity, {'camera': 'microscope.Cameras.cameramodule.SomeCamera', 'camera.someSetting': value})
The camera module is a python object not a string so shouldn't be in quotes.
I started looking into this and merge into master but then noticed that while we import ClarityProcessor
we then call clarity_process.ClarityProcessor
. So has this actually been tested? What really have people been running?
Exactly my question. We should merge what works and close the other issues.
Needs testing with hardware
An alternative implementation for #121, replacing #124.
The camera is augmented with methods to do data processing and return the correct image shape depending on processing mode. Camera parameters are passed as a dict, to avoid the dot-notation problem discussed in #124.