Closed mikenerone closed 3 years ago
The pypi asyncamqp was there earlier, I didn't yet rename the thing. I've been using trio-amqp in production for a couple months, seems to be stable enough, but what do I know ;-)
It's probably easiest to merge the MoaT asyncamqp back into trio-amqp and continue to use that name.
Thanks much for the update. I will go ahead and use trio-amqp
then. :)
I'd like to ask what the current status of the
trio-amqp
project is. Is this considered production ready and recommended for use? I notice it's a bit behind on merges from theaioamqp
project from which it was forked, but not having dug into it, that may be because it is now independent, and any needs that apply have been addressed.I also notice that you have an
anyio
-oriented AMQP implementation at https://github.com/M-o-a-T/asyncamqp, which is up to date withaioamqp
, but has not been published to PyPI (in fact, there's now a separate project published under the same name). Is that the library you would recommend for use in atrio
application currently?Any related guidance you might be able to provide regarding a client library (for RabbitMQ specifically if that matters) in a trio-based app would be appreciated (even if these libraries aren't production-ready and the suggestion is to use an
asyncio
lib viatrio-asyncio
instead).