Closed brettcannon closed 11 years ago
PEP-101 says it would be nice to have a dependency graph that showed what could and could not be done in parallel when cutting a release. Should throw one together using OmniGraffle or Graphviz.
I'll probably get around to do this during the 3.2 period.
Is this still worth doing, Georg? Or should we make Larry do it? =)
Note: I don't have Macs, so I can't run OmniGiraffe. And a quick gander at the Graphviz website suggests its output lacks the sublime elegance Python documentation has become known for.
I think you can make nice graphs with graphviz if you put effort into it :)
Would this still be useful to do? Thanks to my latest import talk I have experience with graphviz but I don't want to waste my time if people don't need it.
While it's nice to look at a graphical representation, clearly there is no deep interest (and PEP-101 has so many little steps that you couldn't possibly fit them all into a graph, so you have to consult the text anyway). I see no reason to keep this open.
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields: ```python assignee = None closed_at =
created_at =
labels = []
title = 'Create DAG for PEP 101'
updated_at =
user = 'https://github.com/brettcannon'
```
bugs.python.org fields:
```python
activity =
actor = 'georg.brandl'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date =
closer = 'georg.brandl'
components = []
creation =
creator = 'brett.cannon'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 4011
keywords = []
message_count = 7.0
messages = ['74147', '112547', '164531', '164577', '164758', '181127', '181250']
nosy_count = 5.0
nosy_names = ['brett.cannon', 'georg.brandl', 'larry', 'ezio.melotti', 'eric.araujo']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'low'
resolution = 'wont fix'
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue4011'
versions = []
```