Closed abalkin closed 13 years ago
Following python-dev discussion on the issue, I would like to propose trace-deprecations.diff patch for review.
I would like to make these changes before turning to bpo-10342 which will require changing many of these APIs that take a source path to take a module object (or possibly a loader).
Note that CoverageResults presents an interesting case of a class that does not need to be public, but its methods, particularly write_results() need to be documented.
Looks good in a cursory reading. I presume trace test still passes.
If you change the signature of the renamed functions, that would break the current wrappings. Would you use new private functions with different names, or change the wrappings where possible?
Alexander, http://bugs.python.org/file19553/trace-deprecations.diff looks good to me
Committed in revision 86594.
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields: ```python assignee = 'https://github.com/abalkin' closed_at =
created_at =
labels = ['type-feature', 'library']
title = 'Deprecate trace module undocumented API'
updated_at =
user = 'https://github.com/abalkin'
```
bugs.python.org fields:
```python
activity =
actor = 'belopolsky'
assignee = 'belopolsky'
closed = True
closed_date =
closer = 'belopolsky'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation =
creator = 'belopolsky'
dependencies = []
files = ['19553']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 10371
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 4.0
messages = ['120833', '120886', '121028', '121704']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['brett.cannon', 'terry.reedy', 'belopolsky', 'eli.bendersky']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'accepted'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue10371'
versions = ['Python 3.2']
```