Open ncoghlan opened 11 years ago
I recently had occasion to use pkgutil.walk_packages, and my immediate thought was that it would have been a lot easier for me to use if it worked more like os.walk with topdown=True, producing tuples of (pkg, subpackages, modules)
"pkg" would be the package object at the current level (None for the top level)
"packages" would be a dictionary mapping fully qualified module names to loader objects for the subpackages (i.e. subdirectories)
"modules" would be a dictionary mapping fully qualified module names to loader objects for every submodule that wasn't a subpackage
As with editing the "subdirs" list with os.walk, editing the "packages" dictionary with this new API would keep the iterator from loading that subpackage and avoid recursing into it (this is the part I wanted in my current use case).
(This may even be PEP material, guiding some additions to the importer/finder API)
Oops, forgot the proposed call signature:
def walk_path(path=None, *, pkg=None):
"""Walk a package hierarchy, starting with the given path
Iterator producing (package, subpackages, submodules) triples.
The first entry is the package currently being walked, or None
for the top level path. The subpackages and submodules entries
are dictionaries mapping from fully qualified module names to
the appropriate module loaders.
Entries may be removed from the subpackages dictionary to avoid
loading those packages and recursing into them.
If both pkg and path are None, walks sys.path
If path is not None, walks the specified path.
If pkg is not None, walks pkg.__path__
Providing both path and pkg results in ValueError
"""
Regarding the PEP comment - the piece that would be missing is the "iter_modules" functionality. Currently pkgutil provides the support for standard filesystem imports and zipimports directly - the generic function based extension mechanism is undocumented.
I threw together a function that implements this. The only variation from the proposed signature was adding the onerror argument supported by the other similar functions in the module.
Could somebody review the attached patch please.
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields: ```python assignee = None closed_at = None created_at =
labels = ['type-feature', 'library']
title = 'An os.walk inspired replacement for pkgutil.walk_packages'
updated_at =
user = 'https://github.com/ncoghlan'
```
bugs.python.org fields:
```python
activity =
actor = 'BreamoreBoy'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation =
creator = 'ncoghlan'
dependencies = []
files = ['29934']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 17062
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['180847', '180848', '180849', '187311', '221036']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['ncoghlan', 'isoschiz', 'wolma']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue17062'
versions = ['Python 3.4']
```