Python 2.0 - Githubissues

2 PAIN MANAGEMENT BEST PRACTICES INTER-AGENCY TASK FORCE REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Restorative Therapies, including those implemented by physical therapists and occupational therapists (e.g., physiotherapy, therapeutic exercise, and other movement modalities) are valuable components of multidisciplinary, multimodal acute and chronic pain care. • Interventional Approaches, including image-guided and minimally invasive procedures, are available as diagnostic and therapeutic treatment modalities for acute, acute on chronic, and chronic pain when clinically indicated. A list of various types of procedures, including trigger point injections, radio-frequency ablation, cryo-neuroablation, neuromodulation, and other procedures are reviewed. • Behavioral Approaches for psychological, cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social aspects of pain can have a significant impact on treatment outcomes. Patients with pain and behavioral health comorbidities face challenges that can exacerbate painful conditions as well as function, QOL, and ADLs. • Complementary and Integrative Health, including treatment modalities such as acupuncture, massage, movement therapies (e.g., yoga, tai chi), and spirituality, should be considered when clinically indicated. • Effective multidisciplinary management of the potentially complex aspects of acute and chronic pain should be based on a biopsychosocial model of care. • Health systems and clinicians must consider the pain management needs of the special populations that are confronted with unique challenges associated with acute and chronic pain, including the following: children/youth, older adults, women, pregnant women, individuals with chronic relapsing pain conditions such as sickle cell disease, racial and ethnic populations, active duty military and reserve service members and Veterans, and patients with cancer who require palliative care. • Risk assessment is one of the four cross-cutting policy approaches necessary for best practices in providing individualized, patient-centered care. A thorough patient assessment and evaluation for treatment that includes a risk-benefit analysis are important considerations when developing patient-centered treatment. Risk assessment involves identifying risk factors from patient history; family history; current biopsychosocial factors; and screening and diagnostic tools, including prescription drug monitoring programs, laboratory data, and other measures. Risk stratification for a particular patient can aid in determining appropriate treatments for the best clinical outcomes for that patient. The final report and this section in particular emphasize safe opioid stewardship, with regular reevaluation of the patient. • Stigma can be a barrier to treatment of painful conditions. Compassionate, empathetic care centered on a patient-clinician relationship is necessary to counter the suffering of patients with painful conditions and to address the various challenges associated with the stigma of living with pain. Stigma often presents a barrier to care and is often cited as a challenge for patients, families, caregivers, and providers. • Improving education about pain conditions and their treatment for patients, families, caregivers, clinicians, and policymakers is vital to enhancing pain care. Patient education can be emphasized through various means, including clinician discussion, informational materials, and web resources. More effective education and training about acute and chronic pain should occur at all levels of clinician training, including undergraduate educational curricula, graduate professional training, and continuing professional education, with the use of proven innovations such as the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) model. Education for the public as well as for policymakers and legislators is emphasized to ensure that expert and cutting-edge understanding is part of policy that can affect clinical care and outcomes. • Addressing barriers to access to care is essential in optimizing pain care. Recommendations include addressing the gap in our workforce for all disciplines involved in pain management. In addition, improved insurance coverage and payment for different pain management modalities is critical to improving access to effective clinical care and should include coverage and payment for care coordination, complex opioid management, and telemedicine. It is also important to note that in many parts of the country, patients have access only to a primary care provider (PCP). Support for education, time, and financial resources for PCPs is essential to managing patients who have painful conditions. • Research and Development: Continued medical and scientific research is critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying the transition from acute to chronic pain; to translating promising scientific advances into new and effective diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic approaches for patients; and to implementing these approaches effectively in health systems.PAIN MANAGEMENT BEST PRACTICES INTER-AGENCY TASK FORCE REPORT 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A review of the CDC Guideline (as mandated by the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act legislation): The Task Force recognizes the utility of the 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain released by the CDC and its contribution to mitigating unnecessary opioid exposure and the adverse outcomes associated with opioids. It also recognizes unintended consequences that have resulted following the release of the guidelines in 2016, which are due in part to misapplication or misinterpretation of the guideline, including forced tapers and patient abandonment. The CDC recently published a pivotal article in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 24, 2019, specifically reiterating that the CDC Guideline has been, in some instances, misinterpreted or misapplied.1 The authors highlight that the guideline does not address or suggest discontinuation of opioids prescribed at higher dosages. They note, “policies invoking the opioid-prescribing guideline that do not actually reflect its content and nuances can be used to justify actions contrary to the guideline’s intent.” Educating stakeholders about the intent of the guideline (as it relates to the use of opioids for chronic pain by primary care clinicians), reemphasis of the core benefits of the guideline, and encouraging optimal application of this guideline are essential to optimizing acute and chronic pain care. (Please see Section 4: Review of the CDC Guideline in the attached Task Force report). The Task Force, which included a broad spectrum of stakeholder perspectives, was convened to address one of the greatest public health crises of our time. The Task Force respectfully submits these gaps and recommendations, with special acknowledgement of the brave individuals who have told their stories about the challenges wrought by pain in their lives, the thousands of members of the public and organizations sharing their various perspectives and experiences through public comments, and the millions of others they represent in our nation who have been affected by pain.@pythonone44 @pythonone44 ~~python~~

pythonone44 / kali-2.0

Python 2.0 #4