Closed y-ich closed 5 years ago
here is some test
http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/cross/LZ_05db_ELFv2_p800.html
@godmoves san, @l1t1 san, Thank you for your information.
So does it mean that extending filters from 224 to 256 was not effective?
Even so, it seems that opening play style of v2 is different from the one of v1. Very interesting. I really appreciate the hard work of ELF developers.
v2 is trained from scratch with 20 million new games.
@alreadydone san. Yes, I knew it. "extending" was misleading.
some new test result on github of leelazero now
2440 games vs elf v1 59.96%
@l1t1 san, Thank you for your information.
59.96% means +70 Elo rating. I think that your information is the result in the condition of the same number of playouts. Is my understanding right?
224 channels is faster than 256 channels roughly by 1.14 times. Assuming that x2 playouts is 200 Elo stronger, v1 get +39 Elo rating by x1.14 playouts. So in the condition of time parity, v2 is +31 Elo stronger than v1.
According to the test from lz website, they are roughly the same strength.