Improving inductor pattern matcher's replacement graph assumptions

[zou3519]

The pattern matcher assumes by default that it is safe to run functional passes on the replacement graph. The ones it runs are DCE and remove_noop_ops. We should try to change it to be more automatic and determine if those passes are safe to run (or add invariants if this is too hard, see also https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/133250).

This is non-trivial:

• For DCE we can check if there are any mutable ops. If there are, then it's probably a bad idea to DCE
• For remove_noop_ops -- this is trickier. We cannot remove intermediate clones if they end up changing the alias relationship between the outputs and the inputs of the replacement graph.

cc @ezyang @chauhang @penguinwu @voznesenskym @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire

[mfbalin]

Is this related to #133942 somehow?