codecov[bot]
commented
9 months ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.08% :tada:
Comparison is base (
2262e3c) 98.31% compared to head (2733fda) 98.40%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #634 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 98.31% 98.40% +0.08% ========================================== Files 13 13 Lines 2557 2573 +16 ========================================== + Hits 2514 2532 +18 + Misses 43 41 -2 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytransitions/transitions/pull/634?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytransitions) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [transitions/extensions/diagrams\_base.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytransitions/transitions/pull/634?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytransitions#diff-dHJhbnNpdGlvbnMvZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy9kaWFncmFtc19iYXNlLnB5) | `97.64% <100.00%> (+0.05%)` | :arrow_up: | | [transitions/extensions/diagrams\_graphviz.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytransitions/transitions/pull/634?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytransitions#diff-dHJhbnNpdGlvbnMvZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy9kaWFncmFtc19ncmFwaHZpei5weQ==) | `98.18% <100.00%> (+1.42%)` | :arrow_up: | | [transitions/extensions/diagrams\_pygraphviz.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytransitions/transitions/pull/634?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytransitions#diff-dHJhbnNpdGlvbnMvZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy9kaWFncmFtc19weWdyYXBodml6LnB5) | `99.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This should improve the handling of diagrams when working with parallel states, especially when using the
show_roioption (see #627).Furthermore, local testing switched from tox to nox since tox stopped working for me (MacOS, pyenv, venv).
There have been changes to how nodes are named. "Anchor" nodes (black, sometimes invisible 'points' required as an initial node for cluster) do not have "_anchor" suffixes any longer. This eases the resolution of relevant edges when filtering ROI graphs.