Closed djhoese closed 1 year ago
Wow, turns out it was wrong in the legacy resampler too. Fixed in both now.
Merging #463 (162125d) into main (c56533c) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #463 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.28% 94.28%
=======================================
Files 69 69
Lines 12394 12394
=======================================
Hits 11686 11686
Misses 708 708
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 94.28% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pyresample/ewa/_legacy_dask_ewa.py | 84.69% <ø> (ø) |
|
pyresample/ewa/dask_ewa.py | 90.16% <ø> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
As described in https://github.com/pytroll/python-geotiepoints/pull/38 I discovered that the default
weight_delta_max
in the dask EWA code did not match the docstring. The docstring is correct for MODIS data and matches what has been in the EWA algorithm forever (it was originally written for MODIS code).I really don't want to add a test for this.
git diff origin/main **/*py | flake8 --diff