codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 94.01%. Comparing base (
e2d0ddc) to head (56f4506). Report is 5 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #598 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.01% 94.01% ======================================= Files 92 92 Lines 13836 13836 ======================================= Hits 13008 13008 Misses 828 828 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytroll/pyresample/pull/598/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytroll) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pytroll/pyresample/pull/598/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytroll) | `94.01% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pytroll#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This PR add NPY to ruff rules and fixes a couple of deprecated ruff options