search

pyutils / line_profiler

Line-by-line profiling for Python
Other
2.56k stars 118 forks source link

Rebased normpath comparison #264

Closed Erotemic closed 2 months ago

Erotemic commented 2 months ago

Rebased version of https://github.com/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/261

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.28%. Comparing base (d6a2ef4) to head (d4a3e1c). Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files [![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=xIK8nFU3K5&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #264 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 53.36% 60.28% +6.91% ========================================== Files 11 11 Lines 832 851 +19 Branches 168 198 +30 ========================================== + Hits 444 513 +69 + Misses 329 283 -46 + Partials 59 55 -4 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [line\_profiler/line\_profiler.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=line_profiler%2Fline_profiler.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils#diff-bGluZV9wcm9maWxlci9saW5lX3Byb2ZpbGVyLnB5) | `54.47% <0.00%> (+4.47%)` | :arrow_up: | ... and [4 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils) ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils). Last update [d9d9ad1...d4a3e1c](https://app.codecov.io/gh/pyutils/line_profiler/pull/264?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=pyutils).
amirebrahimi commented 2 months ago

Thanks for pushing this through. BTW, this fixes #152