Open andrea-bistacchi opened 4 years ago
Update: mesh.points should provide a numpy array with x, y, z, correct? This will do the trick since the I can use e.g. the x column as scalar field.
But is this a shallow or deep copy? Data in the numpy array are duplicated and independent from the original point coordinates of the vtk object, or if I edit some data in the numpy array this is automatically reflected in the vtk object and viceversa?
Thanks!!!
mesh.points should provide a numpy array with x, y, z, correct?
Yep, those arrays are what you are looking for
But is this a shallow or deep copy? Data in the numpy array are duplicated and independent from the original point coordinates of the vtk object, or if I edit some data in the numpy array this is automatically reflected in the vtk object and viceversa?
This is a deep copy, editing either the .points
or the array added to the point arrays will not reflect in the other array
Thanks very much! Is there a way to make it a shallow copy, so that editing the numpy array you can also easily edit the vtk?
Besides, I also like to edit cells. Is this possible for different types of vtk objects, just for some, or for none?
Thanks again!
Maybe I wasn't clear. The numpy array that you have access to is indeed a direct view of the VTK arrays. However, I thought you were originally asking if a scalar array on the mesh could be a shallow copy of the points and that is something we cannot support in PyVista.
Is this possible for different types of vtk objects, just for some, or for none?
This is all the same for all mesh types supported by PyVista
Hello, I need to visualize x y and z with a color map, and possibly to contour them etc.
Based on previous issue #217 I understand I can create a z scalar property with
my_polydata.elevation()
.I have two questions:
1- Is there a "sort of"
elevation()
filter to add also x and y values?2- I have the suspect that
elevation()
might duplicate the z values, and that this could cause memory and/or performance problems for large objects. Is this correct? Or maybe the z values are obtained fromelevation()
just by reference, so no duplication is done?Thanks!