Feature Description
...
The current name and size is a really cool addition but it can be improved if we add a checkmark that checks names that are subset.. For example somerandomimage.jpg and somerandomimage(1).jpg having the same size and name.. Although its not exactly the same name, maybe we can check if size is indeed the same, than check if the name of one is a subset of the other.
See example of a situation I currently have:
In pseudocode something like
If the file1.size==file2.size (//somerandomimage.jpg == somerandomimage01.jpg
if file1.has an extension //ie somerandomimage.jpg
tempFile1Name= file1name.name(no extension) //somerandomimage
check if tempFile1Name in file2.name
If the routine runs for every single file than eventually file2 will remove its extension and check if its a subset of file1 as well.
I am not really sure why the hash for these files are different (I manually checked and they indeed were different), they really should be the same. The filesize is eactly the same, image is the same. Maybe different metadata?
Feature Description ... The current name and size is a really cool addition but it can be improved if we add a checkmark that checks names that are subset.. For example somerandomimage.jpg and somerandomimage(1).jpg having the same size and name.. Although its not exactly the same name, maybe we can check if size is indeed the same, than check if the name of one is a subset of the other.
See example of a situation I currently have:
In pseudocode something like If the file1.size==file2.size (//somerandomimage.jpg == somerandomimage01.jpg if file1.has an extension //ie somerandomimage.jpg tempFile1Name= file1name.name(no extension) //somerandomimage check if tempFile1Name in file2.name
If the routine runs for every single file than eventually file2 will remove its extension and check if its a subset of file1 as well.
I am not really sure why the hash for these files are different (I manually checked and they indeed were different), they really should be the same. The filesize is eactly the same, image is the same. Maybe different metadata?