Minimum upload limit increased

[James-Kent-l]

Suggestion

I saw in another bt forum that because users limit the single torrent upload window to 1, they can get data from many other peers, and finally lead to the ban. I think this is very unfriendly to p2p。 So can the upper limit be raised on the software side? The default minimum cap is 1.

No response

Extra info/examples/attachments

https://www.cometbbs.com/uploads/default/original/2X/7/7b7d3a37c3385e20b5b282f843a3f44992de3520.png https://www.cometbbs.com/t/qb%E6%B4%BB%E8%AF%A5%E8%A2%ABban%EF%BC%8Cqbittorrent%E5%B0%B1%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AA%E5%90%B8%E8%A1%80%E5%AE%A2%E6%88%B7%E7%AB%AF%EF%BC%8C1kb%E4%B8%8A%E4%BC%A0%E9%83%BD%E4%B8%8D%E7%BB%99/57011/3

[oorzkws]

So you're suggesting to put a forced minimum on maximum number of upload slots per torrent?

[James-Kent-l]

所以你建议设置一个强制最小值maximum number of upload slots per torrent？

Yes

[thalieht]

Have you considered they may have slow upload speed? You'd prefer it if they seed 5 KiB/s to you and many others instead of 100 KiB/s to some other potentially faster seed from which others can benefit from more? Sure, that one person might be a leecher, it's a gamble, but 5 KiB/s everyone loses no matter what.

[James-Kent-l]

Have you considered they may have slow upload speed? You'd prefer it if they seed 5 KiB/s to you and many others instead of 100 KiB/s to some other potentially faster seed from which others can benefit from more? Sure, that one person might be a leecher, it's a gamble, but 5 KiB/s everyone loses no matter what.

Hello developer, you can take a look at the screenshots I posted, these banned IPs are just blindly taking data from others without uploading them. Therefore, I can only feel that these users are intentional, they are pure leechers. It is necessary to enhance the anti-vampire

[James-Kent-l]

Have you considered they may have slow upload speed? You'd prefer it if they seed 5 KiB/s to you and many others instead of 100 KiB/s to some other potentially faster seed from which others can benefit from more? Sure, that one person might be a leecher, it's a gamble, but 5 KiB/s everyone loses no matter what.

Original post address https://www.cometbbs.com/t/qb%E6%B4%BB%E8%AF%A5%E8%A2%ABban%EF%BC%8Cqbittorrent%E5%B0%B1%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AA%E5%90%B8%E8%A1%80%E5%AE%A2%E6%88%B7%E7%AB%AF%EF%BC%8C1kb%E4%B8%8A%E4%BC%A0%E9%83%BD%E4%B8%8D%E7%BB%99/57011

[Nemo-qB]

This kind of leechers are mostly Xunlei users who love to leech and give nothing back, or flooding the peerlist with fake clients making the connections to real peers a little harder and also hiding their real identity. Its not always qBittorrent thats being faked, see photo all Transmission clients doing nothing and sometimes being uploaded to a little bit and stopping.

[James-Kent-l]

So I think it is necessary to increase the anti-vampire function, and it cannot be detected because it is a regular software.The anti-vampire function of another software bitcomet is to judge whether to block or not by detecting the rated upload data size within a fixed time. I think this function is very good.

[oorzkws]

Are these peers actually causing performance issues, or is this a "moral" issue with their behavior?

[James-Kent-l]

Are these peers actually causing performance issues, or is this a "moral" issue with their behavior?

All I can say is that there are really many leechers, especially the pretenders

[Nemo-qB]

Its not causing any performance isues at all (outside using the connection slot to connect to you). The peers seems to connect and reconnect after a while like its circling around. Its not with all torrents though, I saw it only with a few torrents.

Mostly their intention is not to download and finish the torrent but keep the swarm active somehow by getting uploaded to a little bit everytime.

[James-Kent-l]

它根本不会导致任何性能问题（除了使用连接插槽连接到您之外）。对等点似乎连接并在一段时间后重新连接，就像它在周围盘旋一样。虽然它不是所有的种子，但我只看到了一些种子。

大多数情况下，他们的目的不是下载和完成种子，而是通过每次上传一点点来保持群活跃。

In short, steal the upload