Open taralx opened 1 month ago
Pretty sure it's because we're doing a numeric sort on this enum: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/blob/455a04b68e12ea9b75fedb9e8abee428dec3d3d0/src/base/bittorrent/downloadpriority.h#L33-L41
Download priority sorts mixed < not downloaded < normal, which is very weird.
What exactly do you dislike? The fact that "mixed" goes before "don't download"?
The fact that it's not a logical progression. "Partial download (mixed)" should be between "no download" and "full download (normal)".
The fact that it's not a logical progression. "Partial download (mixed)" should be between "no download" and "full download (normal)".
"Mixed" doesn't mean "Partial download". It is not "download priority" at all, unlike the rest of the items. This is an extra item to represent a folder whose entries have different priorities. BTW, they are any mixed priorities, not necessarily including "Don't download". So the position you've proposed is even more confusing, IMO.
I don't see how it's more confusing. If I sort the column, I get mixed priority things at the top, but full downloads at the bottom. How is that sensible?
If I sort the column, I get mixed priority things at the top, but full downloads at the bottom.
One more time. "Mixed" doesn't mean "not full download". These can be mixed normal and high priorities, or high and maximum, etc. "Mixed" is not a priority, it cannot be compared with the priorities on the usual rules, so it is simply located on the edge of the list.
qBittorrent & operating system versions
qBittorrent: 4.6.5 x64 Operating System: Windows 11 Pro
What is the problem?
Download priority sorts mixed < not downloaded < normal, which is very weird.
Steps to reproduce
Additional context
No response
Log(s) & preferences file(s)
No response