Open sledgehammer999 opened 11 years ago
Until this feature gets added to libtorrent, there are two simple workarounds.
Any thoughts on this? I think #2 would be more robust and easier.
Would love to see this implemented
I download to a temp location them MOVE to a much slower network drive as rapid IO during download works much better on a fast local drive and a long continuous transfer tends to work well over network.
However moves are SLOW, VERY SLOW and the lack of progress is quite concerning on large transfers.
I would love to see a move progress bar of some kind or possibly a different move implementation as there are some other tickets that note using OS native file transfers can lead to much faster and reliable transfers in some cases.
Bump this! We need it!
Bump. This is a much needed QoL improvement
This would be great. It's been painfully slow to move files between docker volume mounts (on same physical drive), but showing the progress would make it a lot better.
Please upvote the top post, more bump comments add nothing.
The new upstream issue is at https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/2923 but it was closed by stale bot
enabling implementation of some indication of file movement progression in downstream clients would be greatly appreciated.
Tracking upstream bug: https://code.google.com/p/libtorrent/issues/detail?id=444&start=100
If it is implement:
Edit: New upstream issue is at https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/2923 and stalled due to a technical obstacle described in https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/issues/2923#issuecomment-397900182