Closed anitagraser closed 4 years ago
I would add the following question:
As an example in our organization we wait for at least 3-4 dot releases until we dare to roll it out to our users
That doesn't mean that some power users aren't testing the earlier versions, or even before the release.
I would also ask what distribution system they use. So that we know if OSGEO4W is 99.9% of the corporate user's. That would really help in focusing packaging efforts and harden our OSGEO4W policy.
I would also ask what distribution system they use. So that we know if OSGEO4W is 99.9% of the corporate user's. That would really help in focusing packaging efforts and harden our OSGEO4W policy.
You mean Windows? The standalones use the same binaries.
Nothing to add from me
Collected and sorted questions
TODOs
@m-kuhn Regarding the question "When do you plan to upgrade to the next version?": would you like respondents to provide a date or some relative time with respect to the next release (3.14)?
The main interest for this question was orgs who currently use 3.4 and plan to upgrade to LTR 3.10. Is it possible to offer months (2020/04, 2020/05, ...)?
Is it possible to offer months (2020/04, 2020/05, ...)?
Yes, I think so.
Should we add something along the lines "which version is the next you are upgrading to" to separate users that stick to LTR and those that stick to LR?
In 2018, we asked users how often they upgrade http://blog.qgis.org/2018/12/03/user-question-of-the-month-dec-18-answers-from-nov/. I guess we can do that again.
Thanks @anitagraser, I also think so. What we will have with thi survey is the possibility to do statistics over different variables (e.g. regression analysis on size of organization vs. update interval) From my side it looks good now. Let me know if you need something else.
I've set up the questions on Kobo. This link should provide read access to anyone with an account: https://kf.kobotoolbox.org/#/forms/a8Fxqyxh4HyNHNng7ADSez
@m-kuhn It would be great if you could check that everything is as expected before I send out the call for translations.
I've also invited everyone who previously volunteered to translate questions of the month and given them the necessary edit right.
Thanks @anitagraser
Some thoughts:
@m-kuhn I'd like to give you edit rights. Please send me your Kobo account name so I can add you
It's mkuhn
Thanks! Note that none of the questions is mandatory. It should be possible to submit without filling them. But we can add explicit "Does not apply" options if you prefer.
I think it would be better, the expectation for radio buttons is that they stay checked (even if checked accidentally).
Thanks a lot @anitagraser! I looked in kobo and it looks nice. if you need help I'm mbernasocchi there.
to me, we should add 2.18 to Which QGIS version are you currently using.
@anitagraser questions updated, how do they look to you?
@mbernasocchi I've added you
looks great thanks, I just did a mini fix:
Question 2 from More often
to More often, as soon as they appear
looks great thanks, I just did a mini fix: Question 2 from
More often
toMore often, as soon as they appear
Actually, we don't ship patch releases more often, what's the meaning of this ?
I.e. can we remove this option or merge it with monthly?
I.e. can we remove this option or merge it with monthly? done: Monthly, as soon as they appear
Thanks. Ready for sending to translation? Let me know if I can still help.
I'll send out the call for translations now. Thank you for your help!
Results of the survey have been sent out on the mailing list and posted on the blog http://blog.qgis.org/2020/04/02/ltr-usage-survey/
You can find the raw survey responses here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lECEhusQcpDpb50MSMYP_5BDfEl4jXeV
Deadline
2020-03-31
Notes
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2020-March/008290.html
Question proposals included below (quoted from an earlier proposal also in this thread).