Closed caiyongqi closed 2 years ago
I'd say the performance difference is very small when the points are dense. It's computed this way due to some historical reasons. Just using the plain chamfer distance should also be fine.
I'd say the performance difference is very small when the points are dense. It's computed this way due to some historical reasons. Just using the plain chamfer distance should also be fine.
Thank you! Now I close this issue.
Hi. You don't seem to be using the chamfer distance directly as the loss, would the performance be better? https://github.com/qianlim/POP/blob/a05404dd44173809abfee4e2ebef57bbc524cfde/lib/train.py#L87 https://github.com/qianlim/POP/blob/a05404dd44173809abfee4e2ebef57bbc524cfde/lib/train.py#L98