Open alecandido opened 6 months ago
@MatteoRobbiati I'm not sure how this relates to qiboml
. It is only used in DBI.
There were already some discussions about including hyperopt
as a dependency or not...
I think it should be easy to eventually move to optuna
which seems to be more maintained.
Yes, moving to optuna
is a good idea.
Indeed, I was having a look as well, and optuna
seems much more reliable!
Since this is related to DBI: some the DBI tests are very slow right now. Could this be improved as well?
After https://github.com/qiboteam/qibo/issues/1231#issuecomment-1968367678 I reviewed the state of
hyperopt
, and it's definitely unmaintained. The authors are not replying to the issues, and the contributions to the code are practically stuck.If we care about the features supported by
hyperopt
, it should be replaced soon.