Quantum non-demolition-ness of the readout pulse

[Jacfomg]

We need a way of checking the quantum non-demolition-ness of our readout pulse before trying to play with #399. I propose trying to implement the scheme presented https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06173.

[andrea-pasquale]

Sounds good to me. Are you planning to implement this experiment, right? It could also be nice to compute the fidelity which should be equal to the one computed from the classification experiment.

[Jacfomg]

Yes, that would be the first idea when I get some spare time.

[andrea-pasquale]

I can also take a look. Btw, all drivers supports multiple measurements?

[Jacfomg]

Not mine at least, but the devices do.

[andrea-pasquale]

Not mine at least, but the devices do.

Is this available for qm, qblox or the rfsoc? @rodolfocarobene @stavros11 @aorgazf

[Jacfomg]

Working for some new routine with is a quantum Zeno prototype. I will try to finish the routine and open PR for the Zurich fix and that routine first.

[Jacfomg]

Btw, this is doing the same with 1 shot. You can see readout pulse 40 or around that excited the qubit. I don't know up to what extend this is expected.

[Jacfomg]

It's destructive :) as per #435.