Protocol to sweep CZ amplitude

[andrea-pasquale]

I added an experiment which consists in sweeping the amplitude of the CZ flux pulse to compute both CZ angle and leakage. By selecting the angle closer to $\pi$ and the leakage closer to zero it should be enough to re-calibrate a two qubit gate.

Here are a few examples: http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/Egis1uTQSYecJl1d3j26GA==/ (large sweep) http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/PWdDh9zWRwKVX6prWRAQXw== (smaller sweep)

Checklist:

• [ ] Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• [ ] Tests are passing.
• [ ] Coverage does not decrease.
• [ ] Documentation is updated.
• [ ] Compatibility with Qibo modules (Please edit this section if the current pull request is not compatible with the following branches).
  • [ ] Qibo: master
  • [ ] Qibolab: main
  • [ ] Qibolab_platforms_qrc: main

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.18%. Comparing base (4c23ced) to head (2dccec7). Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head 2dccec7 differs from pull request most recent head 3f0382b

Please upload reports for the commit 3f0382b to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/823?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #823 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.33% 97.18% -0.16% ========================================== Files 107 104 -3 Lines 7915 7776 -139 ========================================== - Hits 7704 7557 -147 - Misses 211 219 +8 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/823/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/823/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | `97.18% <0.00%> (-0.16%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 166 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/823/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam)