Delay on readout characterization

[Jacfomg]

The fidelity and QND do not seem affected when neglecting the resonator delation time as we are not applying qubit pulses during the measurements. However, there is some anomalous shift on the iq plane that goes away if you wait the resonator depletion time.

Checklist:

• [ ] Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• [ ] Tests are passing.
• [ ] Coverage does not decrease.
• [ ] Documentation is updated.
• [ ] Compatibility with Qibo modules (Please edit this section if the current pull request is not compatible with the following branches).
  • [ ] Qibo: master
  • [ ] Qibolab: main
  • [ ] Qibolab_platforms_qrc: main

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 97.25%. Comparing base (1c6252a) to head (4789ef4). Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #826 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.27% 97.25% -0.03% ========================================== Files 105 105 Lines 7817 7832 +15 ========================================== + Hits 7604 7617 +13 - Misses 213 215 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | `97.25% <100.00%> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...ocols/characterization/readout\_characterization.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2Fqibocal%2Fprotocols%2Fcharacterization%2Freadout_characterization.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam#diff-c3JjL3FpYm9jYWwvcHJvdG9jb2xzL2NoYXJhY3Rlcml6YXRpb24vcmVhZG91dF9jaGFyYWN0ZXJpemF0aW9uLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | ... and [1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibocal/pull/826/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam)

[igres26]

Could we make both plots square and display them side by side?

[Jacfomg]

Could we make both plots square and display them side by side?

We have three plots now, I can plot the blobs alone on top and the two matrices together below that.

[Jacfomg]

Could we make both plots square and display them side by side?

We have three plots now, I can plot the blobs alone on top and the two matrices together below that.