codecov[bot]
commented
5 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: 114 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
51d7cf7) 63.14% compared to head (5b6bbb4) 64.26%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## 0.2 #812 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 63.14% 64.26% +1.12% ========================================== Files 53 54 +1 Lines 5581 5835 +254 ========================================== + Hits 3524 3750 +226 - Misses 2057 2085 +28 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibolab/pull/812/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/qiboteam/qibolab/pull/812/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam) | `64.26% <80.64%> (+1.12%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=qiboteam#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
alecandido
Just merging main and fixing the conflicts. Most conflicts were in the QM files.
In principle I could push directly to the 0.2 branch, but I thought it is better to let people know. @alecandido feel free to merge directly. The diff is large because it's been a while we did not update this.