Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
OS-specific profiles is the designed way of customizing the flexUnitCommand,
but we're open to suggestions on
how the handle this elegantly.
I'll fix it so it doesn't use the -g parameter on Tiger.
Original comment by RedB...@gmail.com
on 19 Dec 2008 at 4:51
Yes, I've worked around with OS Specific profile at the moment, but there are
limitations - how do I override the command for all os version 10.4.*, or
everything
but 10.5.* ?
I can override for 10.4.11 or !10.5.6 but I can't see how to do it for the
generic
case of 10.4 or !10.5 using OS-specific profiles as they stand. I'll gladly use
the
profile approach if I can get down to major OS release somehow.
Original comment by simon.le...@shopdirect.com
on 19 Dec 2008 at 9:11
You can write the command on settings.xml, so it is per machine and avoid this
kind
of problem.
I dislike using it, but is a good alternative.
Original comment by velo...@gmail.com
on 19 Dec 2008 at 10:09
Looks like you are correct. The OS version activation is pretty useless. I
expected it to take version ranges just
the enforcer plugin does, but no such luck.
I would just change all mac invocations to use open without the -g. All the -g
does is launch FP in the
background instead of the foreground. If you're running FP 10, it won't launch
in the background anyway, so
it's not even useful there.
The only other option is to use settings.xml to set a property or special
profile just for the 10.4 machines, or
find an environment variable that will only trigger on 10.4
Original comment by RedB...@gmail.com
on 19 Dec 2008 at 10:10
OK. A settings.xml per 10.4 machine looks like a good approach for this kind of
problem, in the absence of wilcard/regexp support in profile activation. It at
least
gets it out of the pom and lets me force the change in pre-Leopard machines
with an
always active profile.
This is for an internal project so I at least have a closed community to worry
about.
Thanks all for your help.
Original comment by simon.le...@shopdirect.com
on 19 Dec 2008 at 11:23
Original comment by velo...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2009 at 7:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
simon.le...@shopdirect.com
on 18 Dec 2008 at 10:51