Closed LaurentAjdnik closed 2 years ago
If I'm not mistaken (not being a native speaker), there might be a few typos in Specification v0.1:
More generally, could it be considered good practice to replace occurrences of can't/don't/doesn't by cannot/do not/does not (which are more formal)?
If any of these are confirmed, I'll be happy to PR corrections, as soon as the CLA becomes available.
@LaurentAjdnik Thank you for filing this! I believe there is also a typo in at least one of the signatures. We'll push an update.
If I'm not mistaken (not being a native speaker), there might be a few typos in Specification v0.1:
More generally, could it be considered good practice to replace occurrences of can't/don't/doesn't by cannot/do not/does not (which are more formal)?
If any of these are confirmed, I'll be happy to PR corrections, as soon as the CLA becomes available.