Closed arthurostrauss closed 6 months ago
I'm not really sure why the tests are failing, they do not seem related to the proposed changes at all.
I'm not really sure why the tests are failing, they do not seem related to the proposed changes at all.
I think it may be due to the latest qutip update, which occurred after the last time the automated tests were run - I can look into it tomorrow.
Okay just merged a fix for the qutip qobj handling in #354 , you can try again after updating your branch.
@DanPuzzuoli Any updates on this?
@DanPuzzuoli Any updates on this?
Hey @arthurostrauss - if this is ready for review please request my review on the right :).
@DanPuzzuoli It seems I am not able to add any reviewers on the panel unfortunately (it indicates that I am not authorised to edit the PR). Can you assign yourself to the review?
Summary
This PR introduces the possibility to use
DynamicsBackend.solve()
without having to specify at_span
argument explicitly. If it is not specified, the defaultt_span
is inferred from the providedsolve_input
to create at_span
of the form [0, solve_input.duration] for each solve_input in the provided list. This can be useful for simulating easily a fullQuantumCircuit
s as the process of converting them toSchedule
is already done behind the scenes.Details and comments