Closed nelimee closed 3 years ago
@nelimee - thank you very much for your suggestion!
Ignis will eventually be replaced by Qiskit Experiments, written in a way that’s more modular and reusable for experimentalists, see the following blog: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2021/04/qiskit-application-modules/
So we currently do not incorporate new code into Ignis. I therefore suggest that you will re-open your issue in Terra.
Ok thank you for the feedback.
Is there any link that introduce a little bit more "Qiskit Experiment", or it is still only a planned change?
Is the "Qiskit Experiments" this: https://qiskit.org/documentation/apidoc/ibmq_experiment.html or will it be a new module in qiskit.experiments
?
What is the current status of dynamical-decoupling in qiskit-ignis?
I am aware of #545 but the concluding message is a little bit vague and I do not understand if the pull request was closed because the implementation was not generic enough or because there are other (internal?) reasons. @coruscating or @lcapelluto might be able to answer this.
In any case, I had the need to test some dynamical decoupling sequences in the past months with qiskit, so I wrote down an implementation (available here). If this is welcomed, I would be pleased to integrate it within qiskit ignis in the following weeks/months.
A few features of the implementation:
QuantumCircuit
gates or instances ofSchedule
.QuantumCircuit
instances via theBaseDynamicalDecouplingSequence.circuit
method or automatically added to an existing circuit via transpiler passes.I think it is better to wait for an answer about the closing of #545 before opening a pull-request, but if I am wrong please tell me and I will open a pull request.